<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on that Midwifery Madness and Stuff</title>
	<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/</link>
	<description>“Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more deadly in the long run.” -- Mark Twain</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: michele james-parham</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>michele james-parham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Lisa-
"...how can they learn midwifery without attending homebirth?"
I feel the same way. My mum who is a nurse (gerontological, so she's a bit tired of midwifing people out of this world!) thought that she might be interested in going back to school to become a nurse-midwife several years back...but like she and so many others have said, "I'd just be a glorified labor and delivery nurse with more time to spend with my patient and be allowed to catch babies." My mum wanted to be around normal spontaneous birth (and learn its trade) and she wasn't going to get that by going back to college and doing clinicals at a hospital.

Yes, you can make a difference in a hospital or birthing centre by being a nurse-midwife and we need lots of fantastic CNMs in hospitals who really care and see birth as a physiological process. I don't think doctors should touch birth unless it's surgical and even then, they should be required to have a nurse-midwife present. But, you can not learn and efficiently practice midwifery as it is in context with homebirth, if your main hands-on learning comes from a hospital. 

I guess the real difference that I see and here is that the divide is more in how to deal with the spontaneous and how to leave things alone. A non-nurse homebirth midwife usually learns to do nothing first and then to apply what some might consider 'traditional folk medicine' or in some instances what I like to call 'common sense'. Whereas, obstetricians and more and more nurse-midwives are taught to 'actively manage' a pregnancy/labor. 'Actively manage' implies much more than sitting on hands, trusting birth, pointing out that mum hasn't peed in 4 hours, having mum eat a small piece of placenta if she's bleeding more than necessary. 'Active' means to be in the middle of it and monitor every last step of the process and to move it along if it's 'dragging' so that you can go home and get some sleep before your big golf game this weekend.

If you never get the chance to witness spontaneous and physiological birth, then you won't ever learn how to 'deal' with it or how to let it happen -- it doesn't need you. When you view birth this way, you can see the 'not normal' cases a mile away. In a hospital where you are waiting around for something to happen so that you can fix it, you haven't a clue what normal is and when nothing wrong is happening, you'll be more inclined to run tests and monitor so that you can find something to do to justify your time.

"...families had a choice of whether or not they wanted to employ a midwife who practiced the traditional folk medicine or the newer methods of professional parturition."*

We have a choice. Some women want or think they need more specialized care and care that can only come from a hospital or birthing centre at best. They need nurse-midwives. 

Some women trust birth and enjoy the companionship they receive from their midwives and appreciate their midwives ability to help out when they are needed. They want non-nurse midwives at home. 

Some women completely trust birth, their bodies and babies and do not want or need a birth professional present and only think that if one were to be there it might cause problems. They don't want or need any midwife.

I fully believe there is a need for nurse-midwives, but their place is not in the home and a homebirth midwife can not truly believe that by going to college and becoming a nurse-midwife, she will better serve her homebirth clients. Could she make a difference in the hospital world because of her homebirth training, you bet your ass! But it doesn't translate the other way around unless you are willing to abandon all those years of hospital and college indoctrination before you step foot into a laboring mum's home. 



*Valerie French, “Midwives and Maternity Care in the Roman World” (Helios, New Series 12(2), 1986), pp. 69-84</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa-<br />
&#8220;&#8230;how can they learn midwifery without attending homebirth?&#8221;<br />
I feel the same way. My mum who is a nurse (gerontological, so she&#8217;s a bit tired of midwifing people out of this world!) thought that she might be interested in going back to school to become a nurse-midwife several years back&#8230;but like she and so many others have said, &#8220;I&#8217;d just be a glorified labor and delivery nurse with more time to spend with my patient and be allowed to catch babies.&#8221; My mum wanted to be around normal spontaneous birth (and learn its trade) and she wasn&#8217;t going to get that by going back to college and doing clinicals at a hospital.</p>
<p>Yes, you can make a difference in a hospital or birthing centre by being a nurse-midwife and we need lots of fantastic CNMs in hospitals who really care and see birth as a physiological process. I don&#8217;t think doctors should touch birth unless it&#8217;s surgical and even then, they should be required to have a nurse-midwife present. But, you can not learn and efficiently practice midwifery as it is in context with homebirth, if your main hands-on learning comes from a hospital. </p>
<p>I guess the real difference that I see and here is that the divide is more in how to deal with the spontaneous and how to leave things alone. A non-nurse homebirth midwife usually learns to do nothing first and then to apply what some might consider &#8216;traditional folk medicine&#8217; or in some instances what I like to call &#8216;common sense&#8217;. Whereas, obstetricians and more and more nurse-midwives are taught to &#8216;actively manage&#8217; a pregnancy/labor. &#8216;Actively manage&#8217; implies much more than sitting on hands, trusting birth, pointing out that mum hasn&#8217;t peed in 4 hours, having mum eat a small piece of placenta if she&#8217;s bleeding more than necessary. &#8216;Active&#8217; means to be in the middle of it and monitor every last step of the process and to move it along if it&#8217;s &#8216;dragging&#8217; so that you can go home and get some sleep before your big golf game this weekend.</p>
<p>If you never get the chance to witness spontaneous and physiological birth, then you won&#8217;t ever learn how to &#8216;deal&#8217; with it or how to let it happen &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t need you. When you view birth this way, you can see the &#8216;not normal&#8217; cases a mile away. In a hospital where you are waiting around for something to happen so that you can fix it, you haven&#8217;t a clue what normal is and when nothing wrong is happening, you&#8217;ll be more inclined to run tests and monitor so that you can find something to do to justify your time.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;families had a choice of whether or not they wanted to employ a midwife who practiced the traditional folk medicine or the newer methods of professional parturition.&#8221;*</p>
<p>We have a choice. Some women want or think they need more specialized care and care that can only come from a hospital or birthing centre at best. They need nurse-midwives. </p>
<p>Some women trust birth and enjoy the companionship they receive from their midwives and appreciate their midwives ability to help out when they are needed. They want non-nurse midwives at home. </p>
<p>Some women completely trust birth, their bodies and babies and do not want or need a birth professional present and only think that if one were to be there it might cause problems. They don&#8217;t want or need any midwife.</p>
<p>I fully believe there is a need for nurse-midwives, but their place is not in the home and a homebirth midwife can not truly believe that by going to college and becoming a nurse-midwife, she will better serve her homebirth clients. Could she make a difference in the hospital world because of her homebirth training, you bet your ass! But it doesn&#8217;t translate the other way around unless you are willing to abandon all those years of hospital and college indoctrination before you step foot into a laboring mum&#8217;s home. </p>
<p>*Valerie French, “Midwives and Maternity Care in the Roman World” (Helios, New Series 12(2), 1986), pp. 69-84</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Great discussion.  I don't think registration makes a midwife at all.  Mainly it makes them more afriad.  I have a licence in the UK and here in Australia.  In Australia it's almost a burden.  It makes life very difficult and can be a stick to beat us with.

The best way to learn midwifery is on the job with an experienced practitioner over a period of years.  I trained in the UK over 20 years ago and although it was hospital based we attended homebirths and just worked with the midwife all the time.  Breeches, twins were classed as normal and there was no high risk clinic.  Everyone saw a midwife and at the hospital I trained at more than 80% of the births happened with a midwife.

In the State of South Australia they have direct entry midwifery.  They peddle the course as women centred yet as homebirth isn't government funded in this state students are not allowed to work with independents like myself.  How can a student midwife learn to be woman centred if they have to follow the sheeple and how can they learn midwifery without attending homebirth?
Lisa Barrett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great discussion.  I don&#8217;t think registration makes a midwife at all.  Mainly it makes them more afriad.  I have a licence in the UK and here in Australia.  In Australia it&#8217;s almost a burden.  It makes life very difficult and can be a stick to beat us with.</p>
<p>The best way to learn midwifery is on the job with an experienced practitioner over a period of years.  I trained in the UK over 20 years ago and although it was hospital based we attended homebirths and just worked with the midwife all the time.  Breeches, twins were classed as normal and there was no high risk clinic.  Everyone saw a midwife and at the hospital I trained at more than 80% of the births happened with a midwife.</p>
<p>In the State of South Australia they have direct entry midwifery.  They peddle the course as women centred yet as homebirth isn&#8217;t government funded in this state students are not allowed to work with independents like myself.  How can a student midwife learn to be woman centred if they have to follow the sheeple and how can they learn midwifery without attending homebirth?<br />
Lisa Barrett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michele james-parham</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>michele james-parham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks Matthew!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks Matthew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew C</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I like what you are saying in this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what you are saying in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michele james-parham</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>michele james-parham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>It's going to happen and it will happen all around. Women will wake up one day and find that they really can't get the care that they want because they were fooled into helping this nation wide lobbying effort to credential/legalize every tom, dick and harry...not because mums and babes need it, but because tom, dick and harry need it. This is the main reason I am not behind the "big push for midwives" or whatever the pre-witch-hunt is calling itself today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going to happen and it will happen all around. Women will wake up one day and find that they really can&#8217;t get the care that they want because they were fooled into helping this nation wide lobbying effort to credential/legalize every tom, dick and harry&#8230;not because mums and babes need it, but because tom, dick and harry need it. This is the main reason I am not behind the &#8220;big push for midwives&#8221; or whatever the pre-witch-hunt is calling itself today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>"The very system that doctors want and that so many CPMs/CNMs want (whether all of them know it or not) would completely stump out ‘grassroots lay midwifery’."

We're seeing this now in Oregon, which has long been recognized as one of the best places to practice midwifery in the U.S. They are trying like hell to make licensure mandatory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The very system that doctors want and that so many CPMs/CNMs want (whether all of them know it or not) would completely stump out ‘grassroots lay midwifery’.&#8221;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re seeing this now in Oregon, which has long been recognized as one of the best places to practice midwifery in the U.S. They are trying like hell to make licensure mandatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michele james-parham</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>michele james-parham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Emily - that's fine with me. If I don't get around to it by Saturday afternoon, feel free to post it yourself. The post before this one can be linked to as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily - that&#8217;s fine with me. If I don&#8217;t get around to it by Saturday afternoon, feel free to post it yourself. The post before this one can be linked to as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily buchanan</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>hello 
I would like to link this discussion on a post at midwives to be yahoo group is that ok. 
Emily</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello<br />
I would like to link this discussion on a post at midwives to be yahoo group is that ok.<br />
Emily</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiz</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>chiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Good post. You make some great points that most people do not fully understand.

"First and foremost, I attack motivation by money, because that’s who I am. I don’t attack the need for a job for money to buy those things such as food and a life of health and safety. However, when you take something like midwifery or coming to the aide of birthing women and then bitch about not being able to make money from it, because of a lack in education or homogeneous education, credentialing, recognition or etc., you are then no better than what we all bitch about — doctors &#38; insurance companies making bank from birth. Let’s face it, birth is HUGE business and why wouldn’t every ‘educator’, lactivist and birth aid want a piece of the pie? Because they should know better, that’s why. Women used to know the village midwife and cooked for her and gave her baskets and sewed blankets and she just did what came naturally to her."

I like how you explained that. Very helpful. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. You make some great points that most people do not fully understand.</p>
<p>&#8220;First and foremost, I attack motivation by money, because that’s who I am. I don’t attack the need for a job for money to buy those things such as food and a life of health and safety. However, when you take something like midwifery or coming to the aide of birthing women and then bitch about not being able to make money from it, because of a lack in education or homogeneous education, credentialing, recognition or etc., you are then no better than what we all bitch about — doctors &amp; insurance companies making bank from birth. Let’s face it, birth is HUGE business and why wouldn’t every ‘educator’, lactivist and birth aid want a piece of the pie? Because they should know better, that’s why. Women used to know the village midwife and cooked for her and gave her baskets and sewed blankets and she just did what came naturally to her.&#8221;</p>
<p>I like how you explained that. Very helpful. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michele james-parham</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>michele james-parham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.naturalattachment.com/wordpress/2008/03/04/more-on-that-midwifer-madness-and-stuff/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Yes and thank you Monika. I know that, but at times, 'ana' and 'anti-' often swirl around in my head at the same time -- similar I am sure to 'there', 'their' and 'they're', but I guess on a much more important level. Unfortunately, many people actually think that they are in fact 'Anti-Baptists' and not Anabaptists. But, I am glad that you pointed out my typographical error, for those who might not know anything about the Amish and similar religious groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and thank you Monika. I know that, but at times, &#8216;ana&#8217; and &#8216;anti-&#8217; often swirl around in my head at the same time &#8212; similar I am sure to &#8216;there&#8217;, &#8216;their&#8217; and &#8216;they&#8217;re&#8217;, but I guess on a much more important level. Unfortunately, many people actually think that they are in fact &#8216;Anti-Baptists&#8217; and not Anabaptists. But, I am glad that you pointed out my typographical error, for those who might not know anything about the Amish and similar religious groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
