YAY! That’s all that needs to be said!!!! And for all my geeky friends, I guess I should also say, ‘w00t’!

Judges Back Midwife

Midwife Victorious in Penn. Case

Midwife for Amish Wins Appeal

Opinion By Judge Friedman

Judges Back Midwife

Birthing Women Win Legal Decision

PA Court Allows Unlicensed Midwife to Resume Practice

Midwife for Amish Wins on Appeal

…a thing of Beauty and perfectly stated words that everyone should remember when they are to be involved with a pregnant/laboring Mother.

She CAN do it herself.
You CAN do it yourself, when it is YOUR turn.
You are a guest at a Magical rite of passage when you are invited to witness one soul coming into its being through another being…it is sacred and pure.

Kirsten Anderberg kindly gave me permission to post her article on her experience with ‘rogue midwives’. I like to think (and surely many people would say) that I share many of the same qualities as the midwives Kirsten speaks of. I am sure many of you might have come across this article somewhere else, but I figured it would be good to get up here. Enjoy.

Miriamma Carson, one of my midwives

Women helping other women deliver babies is as old as humanity. It makes sense. So why do mainstream doctors and hospitals act like midwifery is some radical, dangerous, medically-irresponsible quackery? In Scandanavia, the UK, and the Netherlands, female midwifery is a thriving occupation. Yet in America, it has been constructively outlawed as a profession, for 100 years. While I was in labor, during my home birth, I actually asked the midwives, “Are you sure this is okay to do at home, and not in a hospital?” They said, “Kirsten, think about it. THIS is the way women birthed for thousands of years before doctors and hospitals.” That made sense, but I had to ask, due to my years of American medical brainwashing.

My midwives were rogue outlaws, in many ways. They fully understood the political activism involved, they fully appreciated the anarchist nature of what they were doing. They birthed approximately 200 babies in the Seattle area, between the years of 1980 and 2000, and they did so with no licenses, and no medical credentials. They delivered my baby at home, illegally, and I am eternally grateful. When I gave birth in 1984, there were no hospitals allowing midwives to birth in them, no insurance plan would pay for a midwife, and Swedish Hospital was the only hospital in Seattle “experimenting” with birthing rooms. There were no single or gay mom childbirth classes, so I quit going to childbirth classes, as they were filled only with middle-class, heterosexual couples. One of my midwives, Miriamma Carson, was bisexual, spoke fluent Spanish, was a radical activist and feminist, and she offered me a safe place, when nowhere else felt safe. For $300, I was given private childbirth classes with other single moms, and pre/post natal exams, as well as a 30 hour labor and home birth attended by two midwives. When I had trouble paying it, Miriamma let me barter cooking dinners for her kids instead. I could never have afforded such superior health care under the status quo, for-massive-profit, medical system.

Both of my midwives, Miriamma and Barbara R., had sons living at home while they were midwives. And they helped homeless teens often. One night Miriamma’s son woke her up at 3 am, saying he had stumbled on a teen girl, in a car, behind the 7-11, in labor. She would not leave with him, so he asked her to wait, and said he would send his radical midwife mom to help her. Miriamma grabbed her birthing kit, and charged out the door towards the 7-11. Miriamma delivered the baby, in the car, in the middle of the night, with dignity, no questions asked. The girl refused to leave with Miriamma, but Miriamma invited the girl to her home, and gave the girl her home phone number before she left. I am wildly impressed by this. Some would say that was irresponsible of Miriamma, and that she should have called the cops, or CPS, or forced the mother into a hospital. But Miriamma understood the difference between trauma and empowerment, and via her gift of birthing assistance without authority trips, she often saved women unnecessary trauma, allowing the joy of birth to prevail.

Once Miriamma had a woman who only spoke Spanish, in labor, in her car, trying to drive her home for the birth. They got stuck in a traffic jam. Miriamma called her nearest friend and told her to prepare a room in their home for a birth. She got off at the next exit and drove to the friend’s house, where the woman had a healthy birth. Miriamma spent years living in poor Mexican villages, and she knew there had been mass marketing of corporate baby formulas in Mexico, as well as in the U.S., shaming poor moms away from breastfeeding. So Miriamma asked the friend whose house they had landed at, to start breastfeeding in front of the new mom, who just delivered, to set a positive tone for breastfeeding. Miriamma was very good at finding healthy ways for moms to learn from each other.

These midwives were also incredibly gifted at networking. They led me to Doctor David Springer, one of the first M.D.’s to graduate from John Bastyr’s Naturopathic College (http://www.bastyr.edu/), with an N.D. He became one of Seattle’s finest holistic health pediatricians and took grand care of my son for 18 years. They hooked me up with La Leche League (www.lalecheleague.org), when I had breastfeeding problems. They taught low-income moms about the WIC program. They facilitated safe homes for domestic violence victims. They arranged safe abortions when asked. As a matter of fact, Miriamma took me to a safe abortion clinic, when I asked, years before she attended my birth. She bought the equipment abortion clinics use, and hid it in her basement, when she feared abortion may become illegal again. Miriamma is from a long line of radical women who saw access to safe birth control, abortion and delivery, as a woman’s right. Emma Goldman took formal training in midwifery in 1895, and was saddened by the plight of women with unwanted pregnancies, as a matter of fact.

Long have the fields of midwifery, women’s health care, witchcraft, and feminism, been associated. In the article, “Witches, Midwives, and Nurses,” (http://www.blancmange.net/tmh/articles/witches.html) by B. Ehrenreich and D. English, they say, “Women healers were people’s doctors, and their medicine was part of a people’s subculture. To this very day women’s medical practice has thrived in the midst of rebellious lower class movements which have struggled to be free from the established authorities. Male professionals, on the other hand, served the ruling class…Witch hunts did not eliminate the lower class woman healer, but they branded her forever as superstitious and possibly malevolent.” Calling self-help, preventative and traditional medicine a “radical assault on medical elitism,” traditional healers named “King-craft, Priest-craft, Lawyer-craft and Doctor-craft” the “four great evils of the time,” according to the article. By the 1840’s, medical licensing laws had been repealed in almost all of the states. But by the 1900’s, racism was also playing into the sexism, classism, and medical elitism, and since it was mostly immigrant and poor women who were having and assisting home births, white women of the Victorian brand, were asking for the white male doctors in sterile hospitals for birthing help, not poor immigrant midwives with birthing experience and herbal knowledge. And elite, white, women doctors, such as Elizabeth Blackwell, turned on the women midwives too. The article says in 1910, 50% of all babies born in America were delivered by midwives. And although traditional medicine was primarily a political and economical issue, the mainstream medical profession tried to say it was a medical and/or scientific issue. The medical profession has attacked the autonomy of midwives as health care providers, yet DIY women’s health care continues, as a liberating force.

When I was about 20 hours into labor, I started wimping out, and asked to go to a hospital for drugs, as I was exhausted, and sick of the pain. But my midwives reminded me that if I went to a hospital, the midwives would be locked outside, I would be forced to do a lot of authoritative things I would want to rebel against via doctors, and it could end up in a C-section. Those threats kept me at home trying to birth naturally, which finally did happen. And I am so thankful for them talking me through it. Miriamma died in the mid-1990’s, due to cancer. It was an emotional loss for the community. Her memorial had a cast of hundreds. Woman after woman bore witness to how Miriamma saved her life when in crisis, giving her dignity and comfort, when many of us had felt like “untouchables.” Whether we were homeless teens, battered wives, single welfare moms, gay moms, Spanish-speaking moms; we were all welcome on earth, according to Miriamma’s open-arm policy. We all deserved superior health care. We all deserved safe births and breastfeeding without stigma. Due to these beliefs, my midwives were two of the most radical anarchists I have ever met.

My friend Beth, in Santa Cruz, Ca., gave birth to her daughter, at night, on the sand, at the beach, with the help of her friend/midwife Moon Maiden. Birth is a tremendously powerful event and being drugged in a sterile hospital with paternalistic doctors is not the ultimate birth experience for many of us. Many of us want to birth, with our friends and families, in nature, without drugs. And such freedoms around birth are barely legal, if at all. So rogue midwifery continues on, under the radar of the mainstream, as political activism, as feminism, as alternative health care. Even with the recent advent of birthing rooms and licensed midwives, this field is a rogue one at best. Even mainstream midwifery resources, such as Midwifery Today magazine (http://www.midwiferytoday.com), and Midwives Online (http://www.midwivesonline.com) have a very anti-authoritarian tone. Doctors are not women’s bosses, and radical midwives understand this. Groups such as the Radical Midwives group (http://www.radmid.demon.co.uk/) in the U.K., see midwifery as a political issue, as well as a health issue. Midwives have been doing this as long as humans have existed. No laws can change it.

Kirsten Anderberg. All rights reserved. For permission to reprint/publish, please contact Kirsten at kirstena@resist.ca.

…birthing as it is at home and should be elsewhere!

I still cannot figure out why more midwives do NOT know how to NOT do anything when attending breech births and other births exhibiting variations of normality. This midwife didn’t do anything but talk to the mother and let her know what was going on…is there anything else she SHOULD DO? NO!

Learn from this video what you obviously aren’t learning at your clinics and hospitals.

I recently read a posting over at Midwives Alliance of Pennsylvania that talks about Diane Goslin and what will become of her and midwifery in PA.

It’s a very interesting concept…the government controlling women and their needs/wants. One of the questions that has been brought up by the courts and commoners (ha!) is whether or not a woman has civil liberties and constitutional rights to birth with whomever she damn well pleases. Of course I say that it’s a resounding yes and a real no-brainer!

I left the following comment for the posting mentioned above:

”Namely, they wanted to know if a woman has a Constitutional right to birth her baby at home with whom she wants.” Yes! If not for every woman…then at least for those whose religion supports and often requires that a midwife be used over or rather than a physician and that the birth take place at home and not a medical facility.

Due to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 the government is pretty much required to err on the side of religious freedom in all cases. This should guarantee birth freedom for women and their midwives.

Due to the Religious Freedom Protection Act of 2002 in Pennsylvania, women and their midwives have even more legal and constitutional support and protection. If the Act above fails, this one is even more stringently in support of the religious victim in many ways.

It is a matter that I’d like to see ACLU get involved with.

And I say it again…I’d really like to see the ACLU step it up already! Why this hasn’t been turned into a real religious or civil rights battle I don’t know, because that’s how we get everything else we want! I mean for G-d’s sake, if members of O Centro Espirita Benficiente Uniao do Vegetal (UDV) can get high on hoasca for religious purposes, then I had better be able to squat a baby out wherever and with whomever! I am not knocking the religious community mentioned here either — I support them and I am rather impressed by their efforts to keep their freedoms intact.

Keep in mind that hoasca is a scheduled one narcotic and in order for these church members (and anyone who comes to ritual) to take part of the hoasca tea, it must first be transported in LARGE quantities across International, Federal and State lines — that’s a HUGE felony for people outside this church, in case you didn’t know. I don’t want to transport illegal substances ostensibly scheduled as “worse than cocaine (it’s a schedule two drug)” across any line, breaking any trade agreement or federal law — I JUST want to birth my babies and educate them in a manner that I see right.

I have two final thoughts: 1) If you don’t want me feeling like I have no other choice than to birth unassisted, then let me have my midwife of whatever stripe, credential or non-credential that I choose and 2) Keep your laws off my body, birth, baby and my constitutionally guaranteed metaphysical/spiritual experiences.

I just thought that since a reader of this blog decided to post about me and my house’s “shoes off at the door policy”, I would be kind enough to link to it for others.

Can Punks have a shoes-off policy?

Well, can they?

On further examination of my beliefs regarding this, I find that it’s not really a rule at our house, but just one aspect of a principle that we live by. We want to show respect to other people and their effects…showing our respect by removing our shoes to help cut down on dirt in their house is very respectful. We tend to only treat others in such a way that we are comfortable with people treating us. On the same note, I don’t feel disrespected when someone doesn’t remove their shoes at my door…maybe I would if they were to make it an issue that they weren’t going to remove their shoes.

My comment I left regarding the matter:

Hey, you’re talking about me — but in a nice way!

You know, coming from an ‘elbows on the table are OK’ kind of person, I can see what you are saying about whether or not persons with an antiauthoritarian mindset can request that shoes be removed at the door.

However, it is a request in our house and not a requirement. Here’s what we like and what we do…no one is going to send you back out the door if you don’t follow. Tis different from someone mistreating my child or husband, in my eyes.

However, all of our friends (who might label themselves in a manner similar to us) have the same shoes off at the door ritual that we have, so it is just second nature for them when they come over.

At parties and other large gatherings, there are usually so many people there who take their shoes off out of habit that it’s hard for one to ignore the pile-o-shoes at the door. Any person not familiar with a shoes off ‘policy’ would almost feel compelled to comply without ever being asked.

You bring up a good question. Even if myself and persons like me were to ‘require’ shoes off at the door, I can’t imagine it really being ‘called out’ or questioned. It does warrant some thought.

So, what are your thoughts on the matter?

If you have read the comments from the last post, you will find:

“It annoyed me that the two most prevalent trolls on all the homebirth blogs had to put their inane spin on it, but ehh, that’s what they’re here for, I guess.”

Yes, that is what they are there for and I am glad that they are over there. I have since left another comment on Sage Femme, which I am sure will be approved eventually, if not already. I guess I need to clarify and justify some of those things that I have said…not that I REALLY think that I need to, but see my brain is wired differently than most peoples’ brains.

First and foremost, I attack motivation by money, because that’s who I am. I don’t attack the need for a job for money to buy those things such as food and a life of health and safety. However, when you take something like midwifery or coming to the aide of birthing women and then bitch about not being able to make money from it, because of a lack in education or homogeneous education, credentialing, recognition or etc., you are then no better than what we all bitch about — doctors & insurance companies making bank from birth. Let’s face it, birth is HUGE business and why wouldn’t every ‘educator’, lactivist and birth aid want a piece of the pie? Because they should know better, that’s why. Women used to know the village midwife and cooked for her and gave her baskets and sewed blankets and she just did what came naturally to her.

Now let’s try to tackle education. I went to school K - 12, some college (some birth/midwifery related), apprenticeship and empirical knowledge. Do you want to know what prepared me the most and from where I have gained the most ‘knowledge’? From actually doing, seeing, observing, teaching and failing. I have learned by living life and sharing the experience with those whom I have served. That doesn’t mean that I found my way here through flailing and kicking and with an infant’s understanding of how ‘this all works’ (actually, that is sort of how I got my official start, but that’s another story all together). I was given more than a basic education in an odd sink or swim kind of way from an very kind and loving illegal Mexican granny midwife and then later from Jeannine Parvati Baker. I have been taught more and more as time has gone on from all the wonderful midwifes and sage women that I have encountered. But I have learned the most from the women and teenage girls whom I have had the pleasure of sharing their most intimate, powerful and vulnerable moments with. Have I continued to educate myself, yes (I’m passively seeking an ND degree) and will I continue, yes. Does that mean that I am better than some others, yes and there are a ’shit ton’ more who are better than me.

Do midwives NEED a unified/homogeneous education? If I say yes, then I probably wouldn’t have found myself where I am today and then I would be one of those who are perpetuating that lie that sage knowledge and heathen practices have no merit, are out of date and unscientific. We wouldn’t be here today if it wasn’t for a hell of a lot of unscientific practice — in all parts of life. If I say no, then I am now one of those heathen sages.

You can not truly measure what a person knows…you can see how many questions they can get right, you can see if a surgeon knows where to cut for a certain procedure (which is vitally important), but you can not measure what a person knows. There have been so many times that I have been moved to do certain things that I was never taught, but it turned out to be the right thing to do. There are certain things that I have been taught to do and could/would be taught to do (if I went to a formal educational institution) that I believe are truly unnecessary and usually dangerous when combined with pregnancy/childbirth. Some of my beliefs are backed by scientific studies and opinions, some by empirically learned and ‘obvious’ connections and then some are truly from the gut/heart and I might even go as far as to say from the Universe and it’s Great Architect (make of that what you will). Am I against those midwives wanting/seeking to become CNMs? No, I am not against them, but I am against much of their educational material, the rules and limits set on them by a patriarchal system of medicine and many of them continuing to perpetuate the practice of unnecessary and often dangerous interventions used against pregnant and birthing women. I am not saying that every one them wants to do these things, but is needing to be able to bill insurance companies and not losing your license because you stood up for something worth the damage/trauma/fear you might cause another human being(s)? Great, you can travel to rural settings and care for people who are far from hospitals and clinics, and you will in theory help less fortunate women, but all with the stipulation that your hands are truly tied from doing at times, what you KNOW is right. You might have a legal obligation to your license and to your overseeing hospital/physician, but you have a much stronger MORAL/ETHICAL OBLIGATION to honor a pregnant/birthing woman and her child(ren) with the rights and with the sanctity of living. Being right, being legal and begin safe are not always friends.

Credentials…again, what the fuck does a piece of paper mean? You can afford a license and it’s fees. You can pass a test that most people can if they prep well enough. You can answer to regulations — because, let’s face it, I don’t know of a credential (specifically a ‘medical’ one) that doesn’t come with it limits and regulations. I am sure we have all experienced a professional who was licensed and credentialed who didn’t know which way was up and we thought to ourselves, ‘ this guy went to school?’. I know to my mother, when she completed nursing school, her credentials meant that she had completed something and that she had accomplished a goal that took her far to many years to reach. I know that when my aunt passed the medical boards exam or when my uncle passed the bar exam that they were equally as proud at completing something. It has brought them joy and it has brought them pain. I am not trying to discredit a degree and credentials, but you have to be more than a piece of paper and a license fee. You have to BE what the people WANT.

If a group of people need something they will find a way to get it or to create it. That has been the case since man first sprung up on this green planet. If a community (be it a geographic community or a ideological community) wants a midwife and needs a midwife, it will make one. It will elect one. We’ve almost always done this, until we started seeing ‘all the possibilities’ in midwifery and then once again when we were practically buried for good. If Jane Doe decides that her calling is to be ‘with woman’ and she represents a need and presents the knowledge that the community seeks, then she will become a midwife. If she isn’t what they want or doesn’t answer their questions and leaves them uncertain, then she will either be a terrible midwife or not one at all. Mainstream mentality tends to discredit the average and ‘below-average’ person in its ability to both recognize what it needs and to see it when it presents itself. If, when or unless a woman ceases to have the right to choose when, where, why, how and with whom to be pregnant and birthing, then she should have just that right and it shouldn’t make a damn bit of difference whether the person she picks is certified, educated, recognized or approved by the government or one of it’s subsidiaries. If we are truly mindful of ourselves and those around us, we would see the injustice in a government or other such institution telling us what we can and can not do regarding our bodies…and as far as I am concerned, if and until a baby is birthed or extracted from our bodies, we hold the ultimate power over what is done do it or not done to it. We can debate things post birth later in another time, when I have calmed down from this fire some!

Am I selfish? Yes, you bet your ass I am. I am a self preservationist. That doesn’t mean that I don’t have a huge heart and desire to help out as many of my fellow Earth dwellers (both human and non), but if I can’t help myself, then I can’t help you. Could I go and sit through the NARM exam and become a CPM? Yes, with some strings pulled, letters of documentation and the usual hoops for alternate certification. Why then, have I not done it? I don’t want to. I haven’t NEEDED to — it hasn’t been a factor with my clients or where I lived when I started and it’s not a factor where I live now. If CPMs become legal here in PA, I still won’t get certified. It’s the very principle of getting certified that makes someone like me even more legally limited. If CPMs were legal, it would mean regulation and with regulation comes requirements. Midwives required to do this and to do that, whether or not they would do those things without regulation. It would limit certain skills and my abilities to serve clients authentically to their needs/culture/situation or other factors. It would leave a less diversified pool of midwives to pull from. I would have to phase a lot of things with, ‘I don’t require this, but the state makes me insist on such and such or else I can’t practice midwifery or you can’t birth at home with me’. While I am all for and a huge supporter of unassisted childbirth, I don’t think that a mother should be forced into birthing unassisted because the government and its sons have placed ultimatums on community midwives and how they can serve their community. I can not willingly place myself under state reign or campaign for others to be forced to abide by its politics and lobbyist schemes. Unfortunately, in our times, birth is as much political as it is physical and metaphysical.

So, what about low-income, minority and other under served clients? I’m not sure, because that’s who I am serving. I ask a fee for services, but it’s more of a suggestion. My husband would like for it to be a contract! Here’s what I feel I should receive for my time and resources in a perfect world…not what I think they are worth, because at certain times they are priceless. Have I ever been paid the full amount, yes. Have I ever been paid nothing at all, not even something material in exchange, yes — but I knew that this would be the case before I ever agreed to anything. Do I usually receive money, yes; or other compensation, yes. Have clients tried to claim for reimbursement, yes - some have won and others haven’t. Would I get paid more if I could bill insurance companies? No, or maybe a little here and there, but insurance companies expect me to actually DO something in order to get money from them. I can’t just sit on my hands in another room and bill for my time. I would have to DO things and gasp be more ‘doctor-ly’ or ‘nurse-ish’. Both things that I don’t want to be nor do my clients want me to be. So, I continue to be passionate about something that I love and pass on the knowledge that I have to other women, so that they can ‘bill themselves’.

Exactly who do you serve, Michele (I get a kick out of me in third person!)? Right now, mainly young radical Anarchist or as well educated, white, middle class women (who everyone else is serving apparently) might refer to them as ‘punks’, ‘outcasts’ or even a few other as ‘hippies’. I am a radical and I tend to stick with ‘my kind’…not because I couldn’t serve anyone else (I have had clients of all walks and with all degrees of bulging and empty wallets), but because they are under served, discredited, unappreciated and very much aware of what they need and want. I come from a completely different mind set than most midwives…I didn’t start out serving ‘posh’ women and ‘trend mongers’. I started out with poor illegal Mexicans, very low/no income white and black families, but mainly single and teen mothers. There have been the religiously fundamental (of various stripes) and those who were simply afraid of doctors and hospitals and fearful of what they might do to them or their child. I have seen some desperate souls, but they were more full of light and understanding then all of these policy pushers crammed together.

Who knows, maybe one day, I will grow up and realize that this isn’t about life, beauty, autonomy and freedom, but it’s really all about who is ‘with money’, who is privileged and what they think is better for the rest of us. Maybe I won’t always be so radical…maybe I’ll stop caring one day. But right now, all I see are the rights of so many women being trampled on and many of the women who serve them are being trampled on even harder. Midwifery is not Nursing; midwifery is not Allopathic or medical. Midwifery is (w)holistic; midwifery is ‘with woman wisdom’ - you could say it’s the wisdom one gains from being ‘with woman’.

Jah Love and Peace

So, this is about midwifery and the madness surrounding education, professionalism and the usual list of complaints.

I left this comment over at Sage Femme after reading Midwifery Education and these two other posts:

“I’ve taken the time to read the two blogs and their posts…I feel sad that there is so much talk about money, insurance and ‘needing’ something (education, credential, otherwise) to prove ‘we’ are something that ‘we’ are not. I am not here to be a nurse, a doctor or any other ‘professional’ — I am here to educate, stimulate, empower and guide. I am not here to be paid…though I usually do

I want knowledge, as knowledge carries with it power. However, I don’t want to be forced to ‘do’ something just because I know how. There is, as I see it, an underlying fact, which many never see or talk about and that is: Doctors want us to be and act more like doctors if we are going to be around and Homebirthers want us to be and act less or nothing like doctors if we are going to be around. it can not have it both ways and becoming a CNM is not the ‘middle ground’ or the bandaide.

I also take offense to all the ‘hippie-dippy’ comments. As if those who are less Earth-minded or spiritual are somehow more professional and able to do their jobs.

I don’t want the recognition that comes with being a nurse, because that’s not what I need. I need healthy, happy and honored birthing families.”

As some of you might have figured out from reading things of mine from archives on the old blog, I am not certified or licensed by anyone — I don’t want to be. Once I ‘hand over’ myself to an organization or institution I have to do things their way. I am not even a certified doula, because I couldn’t figure out how to ‘wear two hats’ as a midwife and a doula — DONA is VERY restrictive in what you can and can not say to clients…as a midwife, the knowledge that I have and the advice that I can pass on are not allowed when dealing with a client who is only a doula client and not a midwifery client. So, since I don’t like being limited by artificial means, I chose not to be christened a certified doula or a certified/licensed midwife.

The fact of the matter is, if those around you that you are in the service of think that you are not a competent midwife, that you are dangerous, irresponsible, not ‘professional’ enough, etc., you will know it and you will not be doing much in the way of midwifery for very long. If you don’t like how someone is treating you, you tend to call them out or at the very least avoid them — and more importantly, you usually tell someone else about it. Why do you think there is always that one midwife who ‘everyone’ loves and they tell all their friends about her?

But it’s more than that. If you know you are not capable of doing something, you won’t keep trying to fool others or yourself for that matter for very long. It’s not like midwives are making enough money to risk harm to a mother or her babe — most doctors are. I’m not saying that midwives would act so carelessly, but it is something to think about…money can be fucking scary.

I guess what’s even more important for me and why I can’t relate to the urge for the creation of and the medical establishment’s recognition of University educated midwives is that I don’t want to be a midwife. I don’t want there to be midwives. I want women to be their own midwives. Birth is as safe as life gets. Women used to know how their bodies worked, women used to know how to give birth and what to do if, ‘the cords wrapped around the neck’, ‘I feel faint’, ‘I’m bleeding more than I should be’. We used to have the knowledge of who we are and what we are capable of…we used to know what to do when things got messy. Sometimes mothers die and sometimes babies die and that’s the way it is, but that is for another conversation altogether. We can know these things again and do these things again if there are women (and men!) out there to pass on that knowledge and rekindle the flame of self-preservation within each and everyone of us. We used to have community, tribes and villages - all full of women who knew what the hell was going on. We don’t have that and that is exactly what we NEED. More women should be educated in women. Plain and simple. We need more guardians of birth, less midwives and more doctors who realize the reason they don’t see natural spontaneous births is because they don’t want to sit on their hands and wait around for them to happen.

America is ranked so low on almost every aspect of medical care in the world (there are 41 other countries with better infant mortality rates than us), but we are one of the most technologically and medically advanced nations in the world. We have more toys and techno tricks than we know what to do with. I’m not saying that there are never times when something outside the usual birthing mother’s house should be implemented during labor, but rarely should labor start out with hooks, tubes, monitors and drugs.

I am not done with this, I could go on for ever, I think, but I have to stop somewhere. Please let me know how you feel.

Close Encounters with the Vaccine Schedule

I’m proud to say that we never ‘really’ had that conversation with anyone and neither has our child been injected with neurochemicals at such a fragile and neurologically developing age or now.

I guess when he’s older and rebelling against all that we ’stand for’, he can decide for himself to go and get inoculated with the latest list of injectables.

Now, me boycotting something is not new and neither is boycotting Monsanto (which is almost impossible unless you totally drop out, never buy another thing and eat only from your yard). However, when I see something that warrants being mentioned I have to pass it on. I never know when just the right article might make the light go on for someone else.

Censorship, Monsanto & The Media: Boycott Monsanto Products

Exposed: The Great GM Crops Myth